Scripting News for 1/21/2008
January 21, 2008About the business with Jason Calacanis last summer.
Let’s be clear about what happened there, because it happens so often.
He’s a vendor with a product.
I reviewed the product unfavorably.
His response was not about the product, it was about me personally. At the time I said “I’ve never seen an entrepreneur with a product he’s supposedly proud of try so desperately to change the subject away from the product.”
I still feel now, as I did then, that Mahalo is a bad product, and that its stated premise is a lie. It’s not a search engine, it doesn’t compete with Google, and his claims that Google is clogged with spam are a smokescreen, because his actual target is Wikipedia. It’s obvious to anyone who gives it a moment’s thought, but it’s not said publicly on the blogs of people in Silicon Valley. Why? Because criticizing Jason is a messy business. It’s easier to say nothing.
It happens so often in discourse on the net, there are so many subjects that are taboo, people you can’t talk about without provoking personal attacks. The net is just as good at distributing personal attacks as it is at distributing accurate information. I guess it’s not a big surprise, given the course of every other medium, that as the blogging world matures, there are more attacks and less accurate information.
But when we don’t say anything we give up a bit of our future. And when you factor in that there are many products, people and companies who are poison in this way, what you end up with is another bubble, created out of the things we don’t want to talk about.
I think it’s better to take the hits in little increments than continue to build flawed businesses, built on incorrect premises.
Consider this a preamble for more to come, because I think we’ve gone way too far out on the UGC limb, we could and should be cutting more fair deals with the people who create the value on the net, and we’re not doing it. That Mahalo continues to be unchallenged with its nonsense plan is just an indication of how bad discourse is in this medium that was supposed to clean up these kinds of messes. Instead, it perpetuates them.
And, by the way, I’ve said nothing here that deserves a personal attack. But my guess is that they’ll come anyway.
NYT: For Old Rhythm-and-Blues, Respect and Reparations.
XMPP as the basis for interop in TwitterLand? ![]()
Matt Terenzio: “Why we wouldn’t use XMPP as the basis for a decentralized microblogging platform?”
Good question. I’d like to play with some simple systems on XMPP. I tried to get started with some scripts connecting to Google’s Jabber server over the weekend but wasn’t able to get a conversation going. I’ll try again soon.
Update: Joe Beda from Google on GTalk & Twitter interop.
A long-standing loose-end.
A feed that tracks changes to FlickrFan.
If you’re running the software you’ll get the updates automatically, this feed is for the documentation of the changes.
With the new version of the iPhone software, v1.1.3, you can put web pages on the home page of the phone.
I bought an AppleTV, I tried fitting it into my lifestyle, but it didn’t. Apple’s vision of how the Internet connects to the living room is a very controlling one. They attain a certain ease of use, true — but the trade-off is too great. I like all the special effects, but I like to be in control of my own experience. I want to be the programmer. And I despise DRM as much as my customers hated copy protected software in the 80s. It does nothing positive for me, as a user, and I don’t think it works for the vendors, but then that isn’t my problem, it’s theirs.
FlickrFan is one of the things I’m working on. Sure it’s crazy to think that I could actually contribute a little to the Mac platform. Apple surely is going to crush me tomorrow, maybe they already have. But why do users care? Why do reporters? It seems to me that we all benefit from choice. When it’s a single-party system things stagnate. When there’s competition, new ideas can gain traction even if it doesn’t fit into the Apple vision for its users. (Which is fairly limited, read this Doc Searls
Something that’s fascinating about Twitter is that everyone’s experience is different. Some people subscribe to 100 people, others 5000, I’ve even seen people who follow 0 people. No one subscribes to exactly the same people you do. And just because you listen to someone doesn’t mean they listen to you, and vice versa. There’s a tremendous variety of different experiences. Yet each of us feels as if we’re in a chatroom. That’s the paradox of Twitter. It kind of feels like IRC while it is nothing like IRC.
Okay, if the
When you first subscribe to a feed in FlickrFan you generally will get 20 pictures in the folder for the feed. People wonder why this is and how they can get more.
Andrew Baron is a smart guy, and he’s not a techy, so when he explains technical issues he does it in a way non-technical people can understand. 

Initially I wrote in my
Movies on iTunes, this is what Netflix was worried about. Lots of questions. Only 1000 titles. 30 days after release on DVD. What’s the quality? HD? I don’t think Netflix has much to worry about, they have much more than 1000 titles (I think I’ve probably already watched 1000 movies on my Netflix account) and they get them the day they come out on DVD, and ahem, I have to say this, so does BitTorrent. Hollywood is still scared of the net. They didn’t give a great deal to Steve, or so it seems.
Once you ship a product you immediately start getting feedback, and if you’re paying attention you can easily find the trends.
Give the users the ability to grant other sites access to their movie ratings. Build Netflix into the social network of movies. You’re already there, but you need to make every other social network connect up to Netflix. You need to be the hub for movie-watching on the net. You’re lucky that so far that’s what you are. But soon you will have to fight for that too, and then it will be too late to try to force your competitors to connect to your site. They will have data that you want. Then the nature of the negotiating will change. Right now you have the data. Use that power!
Watching the Republican debate in
Update: Problem solved? I got an email from my contact at Amazon, he suggested maybe I wasn’t sorting the parameters before generating the signature. I checked, he was right. At one point I had been sorting them, but in an attempt to solve another problem, took a different approach which left the parameters not-sorted. Had I taken another look at the
The problem is that they’re not bloggers, they’re reporters and they work for a company that’s not a blog, it’s a publication. Publishing stuff on the web with blogging software says nothing about the people and what they write.