Scripting News for 4/6/2007

Lawyers 

I’ve been naive about lawyers, but I’m learning fast. There’s a technique they learn somewhere that I think of as messing you up every way they can think of until you give up and give them what they want, and it’s usually money. It’s legal blackmail. They can do it to anyone at anytime. I’m reading about cases that have come before the judge in our continuing case. It’s just amazing to me what lawyers think they can get away with.

I’m going to open the door to a lot of this and shine some light in there. What you’ll see will blow you away if you haven’t been paying attention.

Here’s an example, the case of New York rabbi Mordechai Tendler, “who brought proceedings first in Ohio and then in California to try to identify several anonymous bloggers who commented on charges that he abused his position of relgious authority to get sexual contact with women who had come to him for counseling.”

It’s a fascinating case, and since it was about blogging, there’s lots of interesting stuff on the web.

All this upsets my mother, who reads this blog. She’s worried that I’ll get hurt. I remind her that she’s the one who made a huge issue of buses idling in New York, and she’s won every battle she’s taken on. A citizen on a mission can make a difference, I keep reminding her, but I know she knows — she taught me that.🙂

When Travelocity ripped me off, I wrote it up here, and it was off my plate for a month or so when I was contacted by a marketing exec there, offering to give me my money back. I said no way, that’s a bribe. And while my story remained in the first page of search results for Travelocity, every potential customer was forewarned, this is a company that doesn’t take their customers very seriously.

Critics ask if blogging is a field of banality but arming citizens against big corporations is becoming an important part of our economy, and it’s for the good. Today, when I tell a company that’s taking unfair advantage that I have a blog, nothing happens. In a few years I don’t think it’ll be like that.

People may think we can’t reform the legal system, and make lawyers accountable. But they haven’t found out yet what a blogger can accomplish, simply by making sure the process is visible. I certainly won’t be the first, just doing my part to help make things work better, and more fairly.

See also: Overlawyered.com.

Today’s links 

Aid workers blog network.

Joshua Brauer: Ignorance is not a defense.

Om Malik: Google launches 800GOOG411.

Seven-minute Sopranos. Spoiler city.

Dave Sifry says Technorati is looking for a new CEO.

Steve Rubel thinks Twitter will be sold soon.

Wired: Cheapest Mac ever.

UserLand 

I’m at a UserLand board meeting in downtown San Francisco. I think it’s going really well.

Betsy digs the Wired cover 

Late last night I ran a picture of the cover of next month’s Wired celebrating ten years of blogging.

“Many of you were interviewed for this issue,” I purported.

I thought everyone would get it, but no one got it, until I fessed up that it was a joke, a hoax. Happy April Fools. Belatedly.🙂

Also, when I said it’s not the cover of Rolling Stone, I didn’t mean to put down Wired, I was just quoting a wonderful song from the 70s by Dr Hook called The Cover of Rolling Stone. Back then, the equivalent of a blog star was a rock star, and the highest honor one could aspire to was the cover of the most famous rock magazine, Rolling Stone.

It worked, btw, Dr Hook got on the cover of Rolling Stone, presumably because of the song! Maybe my little joke will get me on the cover of Wired? Heh. 🙂

And yes, I got the idea from Betsy’s site — where she had her famous husband, the Nobel Laureate, on the cover of Wired. I thought to myself, Hmmm, that looks interesting. And the poem just came to me in a fit of rhyming creativity. Love you Betsy! Say hi to Frank.

Trouble in paradise? 

Leo LaPorte: “I’ve asked Ev to delete my Twitter account. I’m concerned about confusion with TWiT.” Screen shot.

4 responses to this post.

  1. Too true about the lawyers.

    Reply

  2. Posted by dan stoval on April 7, 2007 at 8:28 am

    sorry randy but i disagree. it’s soooo easy to take potshots at lawyers. it’s cheap and satisfying — but ultimately a dodge. they’re no better, no worse than any other profession. and no, i’m not a lawyer. if winer’s running into legal trouble, that’s his particular problem. but it’s ridiculous to issue blanket condemnations. just because i’ve been disappointed by software packages i bought through the years does that mean all software coders are a bunch of gyp artist incompetents?

    Reply

  3. Dan, of course other professions and trades have unethical and incompetent people, and of course there are lawyers who are principled and competent, and there are lawyers who are good some days and bad others.

    But — people are scared of “outing” lawyers who misbehave because when a lawyer gets mad, he can destroy you. I suppose a doctor can too, but that’s a little too scary to contemplate — let’s hope that doesn’t actually happen. But lawyers try to destroy people as a matter of everyday business. Non-lawyers just accept it with a shoulder-shrug.

    My point is that now it’s time to go through that, and use our new tools to at least let each other know which lawyers are the good ones.

    Reply

  4. Posted by Jake on April 7, 2007 at 9:33 am

    Something new from Cuisinart?

    You often have to get in close to a doctor to let them destroy you. A lawyer can destroy you from a distance – without you being present.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: