If I would describe a human co-worker as “intelligent” then I would use the same word to describe ChatGPT if it does the same work. #

3 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Jacob Levy on December 25, 2006 at 12:52 pm

    I’m confused… What does this Trib article have to do with patent laws? This is a separate issue afaict to do with animal rights, has nothing to do with patent laws. Or are you pointing out that non-enforcment may be the future of these laws?

    Reply

  2. Posted by jason on December 25, 2006 at 9:50 pm

    I personally don’t feel that non-enforcement is a very probable future for these types of patent laws. A company the size of Microsoft has the resources to wield a heck of alot more political clout than an animal rights group in Chicago.

    Reply

  3. Posted by Tim Towtdi on December 26, 2006 at 8:40 am

    The most problematic application of patents are in the world of medicine.
    Nobel prize winner Joseph E Stiglitz, professor at Columbia University wrote an essay:

    http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/333/7582/1279

    There should be a clear distinction between protecting IP and protecting human lives.

    Reply

Leave a comment